Compare-Cities.com
Compare Patterson to South Pasadena
This post compares Patterson, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Patterson (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,497 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $43,090 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $258,600 | $928,500 |
| White | 72% | 54% |
| Black | 7% | 3% |
| Asian | 4% | 29% |
| With Kids | 51% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 40 |
| Rentals | 38% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Patterson or South Pasadena?
A: Patterson has a similar population count than South Pasadena: 21497 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Patterson or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Patterson.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Patterson or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Patterson.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Patterson versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Patterson may include: San-Jacinto, Ceres, and Hesperia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z