Compare-Cities.com
Compare Patterson to San Fernando
This post compares Patterson, California to San Fernando, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Patterson (city) | San Fernando (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,497 | 24,581 |
| Income (median) | $43,090 | $37,371 |
| Home Value (median) | $258,600 | $370,300 |
| White | 72% | 57% |
| Black | 7% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 1% |
| With Kids | 51% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 33 |
| Rentals | 38% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Patterson or San Fernando?
A: Patterson has a similar population count than San Fernando: 21497 compared with 24581 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Patterson or in San Fernando?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Patterson.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Patterson or San Fernando?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Patterson.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Patterson versus 45% for San Fernando.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Patterson may include: San-Jacinto, Ceres, and Hesperia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z