Compare-Cities.com
Compare Patterson to Pleasant Hill
This post compares Patterson, California to Pleasant Hill, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Patterson (city) | Pleasant Hill (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,497 | 34,662 |
| Income (median) | $43,090 | $77,000 |
| Home Value (median) | $258,600 | $633,400 |
| White | 72% | 75% |
| Black | 7% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 13% |
| With Kids | 51% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 39 |
| Rentals | 38% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Patterson or Pleasant Hill?
A: Patterson has a smaller population count than Pleasant Hill: 21497 compared with 34662 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Patterson or in Pleasant Hill?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Patterson.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Patterson or Pleasant Hill?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Patterson.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pleasant Hill does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for Patterson versus 39% for Pleasant Hill.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Patterson may include: San-Jacinto, Ceres, and Hesperia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z