Compare-Cities.com
Compare Patterson to Pasadena
This post compares Patterson, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Patterson (city) | Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,497 | 141,231 |
| Income (median) | $43,090 | $59,401 |
| Home Value (median) | $258,600 | $689,700 |
| White | 72% | 53% |
| Black | 7% | 10% |
| Asian | 4% | 16% |
| With Kids | 51% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 37 |
| Rentals | 38% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Patterson or Pasadena?
A: Patterson has a much smaller population count than Pasadena: 21497 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Patterson or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Patterson.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Patterson or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Patterson.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Patterson versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Patterson may include: San-Jacinto, Ceres, and Hesperia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z