Compare-Cities.com
Compare Patterson to Palm Springs
This post compares Patterson, California to Palm Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Patterson (city) | Palm Springs (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 21,497 | 47,140 |
Income (median) | $43,090 | $45,934 |
Home Value (median) | $258,600 | $340,600 |
White | 72% | 83% |
Black | 7% | 4% |
Asian | 4% | 4% |
With Kids | 51% | 12% |
Age (median) | 30 | 54 |
Rentals | 38% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Patterson or Palm Springs?
A: Patterson has a much smaller population count than Palm Springs: 21497 compared with 47140 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Patterson or in Palm Springs?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Patterson.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Patterson or Palm Springs?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Patterson.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palm Springs does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for Patterson versus 41% for Palm Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Patterson may include: San-Jacinto, Ceres, and Hesperia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z