Compare-Cities.com
Compare Patterson to Laguna Hills
This post compares Patterson, California to Laguna Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Patterson (city) | Laguna Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,497 | 31,235 |
| Income (median) | $43,090 | $58,400 |
| Home Value (median) | $258,600 | $649,700 |
| White | 72% | 69% |
| Black | 7% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 14% |
| With Kids | 51% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 41 |
| Rentals | 38% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Patterson or Laguna Hills?
A: Patterson has a smaller population count than Laguna Hills: 21497 compared with 31235 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Patterson or in Laguna Hills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Patterson.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Patterson or Laguna Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Patterson.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Patterson does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Patterson versus 29% for Laguna Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Patterson may include: San-Jacinto, Ceres, and Hesperia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z