Compare-Cities.com
Compare Patterson to Foster City
This post compares Patterson, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Patterson (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,497 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $43,090 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $258,600 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 72% | 43% |
| Black | 7% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 47% |
| With Kids | 51% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 40 |
| Rentals | 38% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Patterson or Foster City?
A: Patterson has a smaller population count than Foster City: 21497 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Patterson or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Patterson.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Patterson or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Patterson.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for Patterson versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Patterson may include: San-Jacinto, Ceres, and Hesperia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z