Compare-Cities.com
Compare Patterson to Foothill Farms
This post compares Patterson, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Patterson (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,497 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $43,090 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $258,600 | $201,200 |
| White | 72% | 67% |
| Black | 7% | 9% |
| Asian | 4% | 5% |
| With Kids | 51% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 33 |
| Rentals | 38% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Patterson or Foothill Farms?
A: Patterson has a smaller population count than Foothill Farms: 21497 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Patterson or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Patterson.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Patterson or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Patterson.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Patterson versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Patterson may include: San-Jacinto, Ceres, and Hesperia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z