Compare-Cities.com
Compare Patterson to Beverly Hills
This post compares Patterson, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Patterson (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,497 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $43,090 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $258,600 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 72% | 82% |
| Black | 7% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 9% |
| With Kids | 51% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 43 |
| Rentals | 38% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Patterson or Beverly Hills?
A: Patterson has a smaller population count than Beverly Hills: 21497 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Patterson or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Patterson.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Patterson or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Patterson.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Patterson versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Patterson may include: San-Jacinto, Ceres, and Hesperia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z