Compare-Cities.com
Compare Patterson to Baldwin Park
This post compares Patterson, California to Baldwin Park, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Patterson (city) | Baldwin Park (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,497 | 76,572 |
| Income (median) | $43,090 | $31,956 |
| Home Value (median) | $258,600 | $357,500 |
| White | 72% | 34% |
| Black | 7% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 18% |
| With Kids | 51% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 33 |
| Rentals | 38% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Patterson or Baldwin Park?
A: Patterson has a much smaller population count than Baldwin Park: 21497 compared with 76572 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Patterson or in Baldwin Park?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Patterson.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Patterson or Baldwin Park?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Patterson.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Baldwin Park does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for Patterson versus 43% for Baldwin Park.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Patterson may include: San-Jacinto, Ceres, and Hesperia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z