Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pasadena to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Pasadena, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pasadena (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 141,231 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $59,401 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $689,700 | $322,800 |
| White | 53% | 36% |
| Black | 10% | 1% |
| Asian | 16% | 10% |
| With Kids | 25% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 32 |
| Rentals | 56% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pasadena or South San Jose Hills?
A: Pasadena has a much larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 141231 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pasadena or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pasadena or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 56% for Pasadena versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pasadena may include: Culver-City, Marina, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z