Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pasadena to South San Francisco
This post compares Pasadena, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pasadena (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 141,231 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $59,401 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $689,700 | $697,400 |
| White | 53% | 33% |
| Black | 10% | 2% |
| Asian | 16% | 39% |
| With Kids | 25% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 39 |
| Rentals | 56% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pasadena or South San Francisco?
A: Pasadena has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 141231 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pasadena or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pasadena or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 56% for Pasadena versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pasadena may include: Culver-City, Marina, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z