Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pasadena to South El Monte
This post compares Pasadena, California to South El Monte, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pasadena (city) | South El Monte (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 141,231 | 20,712 |
| Income (median) | $59,401 | $28,039 |
| Home Value (median) | $689,700 | $389,400 |
| White | 53% | 59% |
| Black | 10% | 0% |
| Asian | 16% | 14% |
| With Kids | 25% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 34 |
| Rentals | 56% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pasadena or South El Monte?
A: Pasadena has a much larger population count than South El Monte: 141231 compared with 20712 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pasadena or in South El Monte?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pasadena or South El Monte?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 56% for Pasadena versus 52% for South El Monte.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pasadena may include: Culver-City, Marina, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z