Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pasadena to Santa Paula
This post compares Pasadena, California to Santa Paula, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pasadena (city) | Santa Paula (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 141,231 | 30,344 |
| Income (median) | $59,401 | $36,718 |
| Home Value (median) | $689,700 | $349,500 |
| White | 53% | 85% |
| Black | 10% | 0% |
| Asian | 16% | 1% |
| With Kids | 25% | 43% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 32 |
| Rentals | 56% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pasadena or Santa Paula?
A: Pasadena has a much larger population count than Santa Paula: 141231 compared with 30344 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pasadena or in Santa Paula?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pasadena or Santa Paula?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 56% for Pasadena versus 45% for Santa Paula.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pasadena may include: Culver-City, Marina, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z