Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pasadena to Sanger
This post compares Pasadena, California to Sanger, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pasadena (city) | Sanger (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 141,231 | 24,883 |
| Income (median) | $59,401 | $35,793 |
| Home Value (median) | $689,700 | $178,900 |
| White | 53% | 77% |
| Black | 10% | 0% |
| Asian | 16% | 2% |
| With Kids | 25% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 32 |
| Rentals | 56% | 42% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pasadena or Sanger?
A: Pasadena has a much larger population count than Sanger: 141231 compared with 24883 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pasadena or in Sanger?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pasadena or Sanger?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 56% for Pasadena versus 42% for Sanger.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pasadena may include: Culver-City, Marina, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z