Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pasadena to San Fernando
This post compares Pasadena, California to San Fernando, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pasadena (city) | San Fernando (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 141,231 | 24,581 |
| Income (median) | $59,401 | $37,371 |
| Home Value (median) | $689,700 | $370,300 |
| White | 53% | 57% |
| Black | 10% | 1% |
| Asian | 16% | 1% |
| With Kids | 25% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 33 |
| Rentals | 56% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pasadena or San Fernando?
A: Pasadena has a much larger population count than San Fernando: 141231 compared with 24581 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pasadena or in San Fernando?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pasadena or San Fernando?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 56% for Pasadena versus 45% for San Fernando.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pasadena may include: Culver-City, Marina, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z