Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pasadena to Rancho San Diego
This post compares Pasadena, California to Rancho San Diego, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Pasadena (city) | Rancho San Diego (CDP) |
---|---|---|
Population | 141,231 | 21,651 |
Income (median) | $59,401 | $68,326 |
Home Value (median) | $689,700 | $560,100 |
White | 53% | 84% |
Black | 10% | 2% |
Asian | 16% | 3% |
With Kids | 25% | 31% |
Age (median) | 37 | 42 |
Rentals | 56% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pasadena or Rancho San Diego?
A: Pasadena has a much larger population count than Rancho San Diego: 141231 compared with 21651 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pasadena or in Rancho San Diego?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pasadena or Rancho San Diego?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 56% for Pasadena versus 30% for Rancho San Diego.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pasadena may include: Culver-City, Marina, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z