Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pasadena to Patterson
This post compares Pasadena, California to Patterson, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pasadena (city) | Patterson (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 141,231 | 21,497 |
| Income (median) | $59,401 | $43,090 |
| Home Value (median) | $689,700 | $258,600 |
| White | 53% | 72% |
| Black | 10% | 7% |
| Asian | 16% | 4% |
| With Kids | 25% | 51% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 30 |
| Rentals | 56% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pasadena or Patterson?
A: Pasadena has a much larger population count than Patterson: 141231 compared with 21497 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pasadena or in Patterson?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pasadena or Patterson?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 56% for Pasadena versus 38% for Patterson.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pasadena may include: Culver-City, Marina, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z