Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pasadena to Palm Desert
This post compares Pasadena, California to Palm Desert, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pasadena (city) | Palm Desert (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 141,231 | 51,675 |
| Income (median) | $59,401 | $47,261 |
| Home Value (median) | $689,700 | $328,300 |
| White | 53% | 82% |
| Black | 10% | 1% |
| Asian | 16% | 4% |
| With Kids | 25% | 17% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 52 |
| Rentals | 56% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pasadena or Palm Desert?
A: Pasadena has a larger population count than Palm Desert: 141231 compared with 51675 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pasadena or in Palm Desert?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pasadena or Palm Desert?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 56% for Pasadena versus 38% for Palm Desert.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pasadena may include: Culver-City, Marina, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z