Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pasadena to Oxnard
This post compares Pasadena, California to Oxnard, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pasadena (city) | Oxnard (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 141,231 | 206,732 |
| Income (median) | $59,401 | $35,675 |
| Home Value (median) | $689,700 | $390,000 |
| White | 53% | 75% |
| Black | 10% | 2% |
| Asian | 16% | 7% |
| With Kids | 25% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 31 |
| Rentals | 56% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pasadena or Oxnard?
A: Pasadena has a smaller population count than Oxnard: 141231 compared with 206732 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pasadena or in Oxnard?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pasadena or Oxnard?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 56% for Pasadena versus 46% for Oxnard.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pasadena may include: Culver-City, Marina, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z