Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pasadena to Oakdale
This post compares Pasadena, California to Oakdale, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pasadena (city) | Oakdale (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 141,231 | 22,256 |
| Income (median) | $59,401 | $46,834 |
| Home Value (median) | $689,700 | $263,800 |
| White | 53% | 87% |
| Black | 10% | 1% |
| Asian | 16% | 1% |
| With Kids | 25% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 35 |
| Rentals | 56% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pasadena or Oakdale?
A: Pasadena has a much larger population count than Oakdale: 141231 compared with 22256 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pasadena or in Oakdale?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pasadena or Oakdale?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 56% for Pasadena versus 41% for Oakdale.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pasadena may include: Culver-City, Marina, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z