Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pasadena to Newark
This post compares Pasadena, California to Newark, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pasadena (city) | Newark (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 141,231 | 45,554 |
| Income (median) | $59,401 | $55,190 |
| Home Value (median) | $689,700 | $607,200 |
| White | 53% | 33% |
| Black | 10% | 5% |
| Asian | 16% | 30% |
| With Kids | 25% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 37 |
| Rentals | 56% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pasadena or Newark?
A: Pasadena has a larger population count than Newark: 141231 compared with 45554 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pasadena or in Newark?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pasadena or Newark?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 56% for Pasadena versus 30% for Newark.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pasadena may include: Culver-City, Marina, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z