Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pasadena to Foster City
This post compares Pasadena, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pasadena (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 141,231 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $59,401 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $689,700 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 53% | 43% |
| Black | 10% | 2% |
| Asian | 16% | 47% |
| With Kids | 25% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 40 |
| Rentals | 56% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pasadena or Foster City?
A: Pasadena has a much larger population count than Foster City: 141231 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pasadena or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pasadena or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 56% for Pasadena versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pasadena may include: Culver-City, Marina, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z