Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pasadena to Desert Hot Springs
This post compares Pasadena, California to Desert Hot Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pasadena (city) | Desert Hot Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 141,231 | 28,298 |
| Income (median) | $59,401 | $32,379 |
| Home Value (median) | $689,700 | $154,600 |
| White | 53% | 70% |
| Black | 10% | 7% |
| Asian | 16% | 2% |
| With Kids | 25% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 34 |
| Rentals | 56% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pasadena or Desert Hot Springs?
A: Pasadena has a much larger population count than Desert Hot Springs: 141231 compared with 28298 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pasadena or in Desert Hot Springs?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pasadena or Desert Hot Springs?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 56% for Pasadena versus 56% for Desert Hot Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pasadena may include: Culver-City, Marina, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z