Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pasadena to Chino Hills
This post compares Pasadena, California to Chino Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pasadena (city) | Chino Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 141,231 | 78,025 |
| Income (median) | $59,401 | $66,607 |
| Home Value (median) | $689,700 | $567,200 |
| White | 53% | 46% |
| Black | 10% | 4% |
| Asian | 16% | 33% |
| With Kids | 25% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 38 |
| Rentals | 56% | 23% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pasadena or Chino Hills?
A: Pasadena has a larger population count than Chino Hills: 141231 compared with 78025 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pasadena or in Chino Hills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pasadena or Chino Hills?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 56% for Pasadena versus 23% for Chino Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pasadena may include: Culver-City, Marina, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z