Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pasadena to Chico
This post compares Pasadena, California to Chico, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pasadena (city) | Chico (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 141,231 | 90,660 |
| Income (median) | $59,401 | $43,253 |
| Home Value (median) | $689,700 | $286,700 |
| White | 53% | 82% |
| Black | 10% | 2% |
| Asian | 16% | 4% |
| With Kids | 25% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 29 |
| Rentals | 56% | 55% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pasadena or Chico?
A: Pasadena has a larger population count than Chico: 141231 compared with 90660 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pasadena or in Chico?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pasadena or Chico?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 56% for Pasadena versus 55% for Chico.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pasadena may include: Culver-City, Marina, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z