Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pasadena to Campbell
This post compares Pasadena, California to Campbell, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pasadena (city) | Campbell (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 141,231 | 41,164 |
| Income (median) | $59,401 | $76,436 |
| Home Value (median) | $689,700 | $884,600 |
| White | 53% | 65% |
| Black | 10% | 3% |
| Asian | 16% | 18% |
| With Kids | 25% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 39 |
| Rentals | 56% | 50% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pasadena or Campbell?
A: Pasadena has a larger population count than Campbell: 141231 compared with 41164 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pasadena or in Campbell?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pasadena or Campbell?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 56% for Pasadena versus 50% for Campbell.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pasadena may include: Culver-City, Marina, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z