Compare-Cities.com
Compare Paradise to South Pasadena
This post compares Paradise, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Paradise (town) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,437 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $41,626 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $380,800 | $928,500 |
| White | 92% | 54% |
| Black | 0% | 3% |
| Asian | 1% | 29% |
| With Kids | 22% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 49 | 40 |
| Rentals | 10% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Paradise or South Pasadena?
A: Paradise has a similar population count than South Pasadena: 26437 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Paradise or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Paradise.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Paradise or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Paradise.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 10% for Paradise versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Paradise may include: La-Quinta, Lincoln, and Orcutt.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z