Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palo Alto to South San Francisco
This post compares Palo Alto, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palo Alto (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,082 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $124,900 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,989,300 | $697,400 |
| White | 61% | 33% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 31% | 39% |
| With Kids | 34% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 39 |
| Rentals | 45% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palo Alto or South San Francisco?
A: Palo Alto has a similar population count than South San Francisco: 67082 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palo Alto or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Palo Alto.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palo Alto or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Palo Alto.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palo Alto does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Palo Alto versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palo Alto may include: Menlo-Park, Burlingame, and Manhattan-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z