Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palo Alto to South Pasadena
This post compares Palo Alto, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palo Alto (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,082 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $124,900 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,989,300 | $928,500 |
| White | 61% | 54% |
| Black | 1% | 3% |
| Asian | 31% | 29% |
| With Kids | 34% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 40 |
| Rentals | 45% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palo Alto or South Pasadena?
A: Palo Alto has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 67082 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palo Alto or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Palo Alto.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palo Alto or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Palo Alto.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Palo Alto versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palo Alto may include: Menlo-Park, Burlingame, and Manhattan-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z