Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palmdale to South San Francisco
This post compares Palmdale, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palmdale (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 157,358 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $43,017 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $229,200 | $697,400 |
| White | 42% | 33% |
| Black | 12% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 39% |
| With Kids | 49% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 39 |
| Rentals | 36% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palmdale or South San Francisco?
A: Palmdale has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 157358 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palmdale or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Palmdale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palmdale or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Palmdale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 36% for Palmdale versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palmdale may include: Fontana, Moreno-Valley, and Bay-Point.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z