Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palmdale to La Verne
This post compares Palmdale, California to La Verne, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palmdale (city) | La Verne (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 157,358 | 32,320 |
| Income (median) | $43,017 | $57,816 |
| Home Value (median) | $229,200 | $535,900 |
| White | 42% | 74% |
| Black | 12% | 4% |
| Asian | 4% | 7% |
| With Kids | 49% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 43 |
| Rentals | 36% | 25% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palmdale or La Verne?
A: Palmdale has a much larger population count than La Verne: 157358 compared with 32320 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palmdale or in La Verne?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Palmdale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palmdale or La Verne?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Palmdale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palmdale does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 36% for Palmdale versus 25% for La Verne.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palmdale may include: Fontana, Moreno-Valley, and Bay-Point.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z