Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palmdale to Foothill Farms
This post compares Palmdale, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palmdale (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 157,358 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $43,017 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $229,200 | $201,200 |
| White | 42% | 67% |
| Black | 12% | 9% |
| Asian | 4% | 5% |
| With Kids | 49% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 33 |
| Rentals | 36% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palmdale or Foothill Farms?
A: Palmdale has a much larger population count than Foothill Farms: 157358 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palmdale or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Palmdale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palmdale or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Palmdale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 36% for Palmdale versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palmdale may include: Fontana, Moreno-Valley, and Bay-Point.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z