Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palmdale to Baldwin Park
This post compares Palmdale, California to Baldwin Park, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Palmdale (city) | Baldwin Park (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 157,358 | 76,572 |
Income (median) | $43,017 | $31,956 |
Home Value (median) | $229,200 | $357,500 |
White | 42% | 34% |
Black | 12% | 2% |
Asian | 4% | 18% |
With Kids | 49% | 48% |
Age (median) | 31 | 33 |
Rentals | 36% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palmdale or Baldwin Park?
A: Palmdale has a larger population count than Baldwin Park: 157358 compared with 76572 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palmdale or in Baldwin Park?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Palmdale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palmdale or Baldwin Park?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Palmdale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Baldwin Park does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 36% for Palmdale versus 43% for Baldwin Park.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palmdale may include: Fontana, Moreno-Valley, and Bay-Point.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z