Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Springs to Union City
This post compares Palm Springs, California to Union City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Palm Springs (city) | Union City (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 47,140 | 74,354 |
Income (median) | $45,934 | $55,732 |
Home Value (median) | $340,600 | $620,200 |
White | 83% | 21% |
Black | 4% | 5% |
Asian | 4% | 53% |
With Kids | 12% | 39% |
Age (median) | 54 | 38 |
Rentals | 41% | 34% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Springs or Union City?
A: Palm Springs has a smaller population count than Union City: 47140 compared with 74354 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Springs or in Union City?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Palm Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Springs or Union City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Palm Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palm Springs does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Palm Springs versus 34% for Union City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Springs may include: Palm-Desert, Seal-Beach, and Fair-Oaks.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z