Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Springs to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Palm Springs, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Springs (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,140 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $45,934 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $340,600 | $322,800 |
| White | 83% | 36% |
| Black | 4% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 10% |
| With Kids | 12% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 54 | 32 |
| Rentals | 41% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Springs or South San Jose Hills?
A: Palm Springs has a larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 47140 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Springs or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Palm Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Springs or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Palm Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palm Springs does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Palm Springs versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Springs may include: Palm-Desert, Seal-Beach, and Fair-Oaks.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z