Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Springs to South San Francisco
This post compares Palm Springs, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Springs (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,140 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $45,934 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $340,600 | $697,400 |
| White | 83% | 33% |
| Black | 4% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 39% |
| With Kids | 12% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 54 | 39 |
| Rentals | 41% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Springs or South San Francisco?
A: Palm Springs has a smaller population count than South San Francisco: 47140 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Springs or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Palm Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Springs or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Palm Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palm Springs does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Palm Springs versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Springs may include: Palm-Desert, Seal-Beach, and Fair-Oaks.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z