Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Springs to South El Monte
This post compares Palm Springs, California to South El Monte, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Springs (city) | South El Monte (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,140 | 20,712 |
| Income (median) | $45,934 | $28,039 |
| Home Value (median) | $340,600 | $389,400 |
| White | 83% | 59% |
| Black | 4% | 0% |
| Asian | 4% | 14% |
| With Kids | 12% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 54 | 34 |
| Rentals | 41% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Springs or South El Monte?
A: Palm Springs has a larger population count than South El Monte: 47140 compared with 20712 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Springs or in South El Monte?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Palm Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Springs or South El Monte?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Palm Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South El Monte does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Palm Springs versus 52% for South El Monte.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Springs may include: Palm-Desert, Seal-Beach, and Fair-Oaks.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z