Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Springs to San Bruno
This post compares Palm Springs, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Springs (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,140 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $45,934 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $340,600 | $754,700 |
| White | 83% | 49% |
| Black | 4% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 28% |
| With Kids | 12% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 54 | 39 |
| Rentals | 41% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Springs or San Bruno?
A: Palm Springs has a similar population count than San Bruno: 47140 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Springs or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Palm Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Springs or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Palm Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Palm Springs versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Springs may include: Palm-Desert, Seal-Beach, and Fair-Oaks.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z