Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Springs to Reedley
This post compares Palm Springs, California to Reedley, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Springs (city) | Reedley (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,140 | 25,419 |
| Income (median) | $45,934 | $32,215 |
| Home Value (median) | $340,600 | $174,100 |
| White | 83% | 73% |
| Black | 4% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 3% |
| With Kids | 12% | 43% |
| Age (median) | 54 | 31 |
| Rentals | 41% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Springs or Reedley?
A: Palm Springs has a larger population count than Reedley: 47140 compared with 25419 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Springs or in Reedley?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Palm Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Springs or Reedley?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Palm Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palm Springs does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Palm Springs versus 38% for Reedley.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Springs may include: Palm-Desert, Seal-Beach, and Fair-Oaks.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z