Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Springs to Redlands
This post compares Palm Springs, California to Redlands, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Springs (city) | Redlands (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,140 | 70,765 |
| Income (median) | $45,934 | $54,151 |
| Home Value (median) | $340,600 | $350,900 |
| White | 83% | 71% |
| Black | 4% | 7% |
| Asian | 4% | 7% |
| With Kids | 12% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 54 | 35 |
| Rentals | 41% | 42% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Springs or Redlands?
A: Palm Springs has a smaller population count than Redlands: 47140 compared with 70765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Springs or in Redlands?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Palm Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Springs or Redlands?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Palm Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redlands does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Palm Springs versus 42% for Redlands.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Springs may include: Palm-Desert, Seal-Beach, and Fair-Oaks.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z