Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Springs to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Palm Springs, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Springs (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,140 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $45,934 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $340,600 | $444,200 |
| White | 83% | 62% |
| Black | 4% | 9% |
| Asian | 4% | 13% |
| With Kids | 12% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 54 | 35 |
| Rentals | 41% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Springs or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Palm Springs has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 47140 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Springs or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Palm Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Springs or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Palm Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palm Springs does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Palm Springs versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Springs may include: Palm-Desert, Seal-Beach, and Fair-Oaks.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z