Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Springs to Porterville
This post compares Palm Springs, California to Porterville, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Springs (city) | Porterville (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,140 | 58,782 |
| Income (median) | $45,934 | $36,312 |
| Home Value (median) | $340,600 | $163,100 |
| White | 83% | 77% |
| Black | 4% | 0% |
| Asian | 4% | 4% |
| With Kids | 12% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 54 | 30 |
| Rentals | 41% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Springs or Porterville?
A: Palm Springs has a similar population count than Porterville: 47140 compared with 58782 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Springs or in Porterville?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Palm Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Springs or Porterville?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Palm Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Porterville does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Palm Springs versus 46% for Porterville.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Springs may include: Palm-Desert, Seal-Beach, and Fair-Oaks.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z