Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Springs to Pleasant Hill
This post compares Palm Springs, California to Pleasant Hill, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Springs (city) | Pleasant Hill (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,140 | 34,662 |
| Income (median) | $45,934 | $77,000 |
| Home Value (median) | $340,600 | $633,400 |
| White | 83% | 75% |
| Black | 4% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 13% |
| With Kids | 12% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 54 | 39 |
| Rentals | 41% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Springs or Pleasant Hill?
A: Palm Springs has a larger population count than Pleasant Hill: 47140 compared with 34662 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Springs or in Pleasant Hill?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Palm Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Springs or Pleasant Hill?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Palm Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palm Springs does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Palm Springs versus 39% for Pleasant Hill.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Springs may include: Palm-Desert, Seal-Beach, and Fair-Oaks.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z