Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Springs to Patterson
This post compares Palm Springs, California to Patterson, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Springs (city) | Patterson (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,140 | 21,497 |
| Income (median) | $45,934 | $43,090 |
| Home Value (median) | $340,600 | $258,600 |
| White | 83% | 72% |
| Black | 4% | 7% |
| Asian | 4% | 4% |
| With Kids | 12% | 51% |
| Age (median) | 54 | 30 |
| Rentals | 41% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Springs or Patterson?
A: Palm Springs has a larger population count than Patterson: 47140 compared with 21497 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Springs or in Patterson?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Palm Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Springs or Patterson?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Palm Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palm Springs does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Palm Springs versus 38% for Patterson.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Springs may include: Palm-Desert, Seal-Beach, and Fair-Oaks.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z