Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Springs to Pasadena
This post compares Palm Springs, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Springs (city) | Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,140 | 141,231 |
| Income (median) | $45,934 | $59,401 |
| Home Value (median) | $340,600 | $689,700 |
| White | 83% | 53% |
| Black | 4% | 10% |
| Asian | 4% | 16% |
| With Kids | 12% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 54 | 37 |
| Rentals | 41% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Springs or Pasadena?
A: Palm Springs has a much smaller population count than Pasadena: 47140 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Springs or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Palm Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Springs or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Palm Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Palm Springs versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Springs may include: Palm-Desert, Seal-Beach, and Fair-Oaks.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z