Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Springs to Pacifica
This post compares Palm Springs, California to Pacifica, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Springs (city) | Pacifica (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,140 | 39,141 |
| Income (median) | $45,934 | $68,966 |
| Home Value (median) | $340,600 | $740,700 |
| White | 83% | 63% |
| Black | 4% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 19% |
| With Kids | 12% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 54 | 42 |
| Rentals | 41% | 31% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Springs or Pacifica?
A: Palm Springs has a similar population count than Pacifica: 47140 compared with 39141 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Springs or in Pacifica?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Palm Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Springs or Pacifica?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Palm Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palm Springs does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Palm Springs versus 31% for Pacifica.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Springs may include: Palm-Desert, Seal-Beach, and Fair-Oaks.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z