Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Springs to Napa
This post compares Palm Springs, California to Napa, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Springs (city) | Napa (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,140 | 79,722 |
| Income (median) | $45,934 | $51,449 |
| Home Value (median) | $340,600 | $536,800 |
| White | 83% | 76% |
| Black | 4% | 0% |
| Asian | 4% | 3% |
| With Kids | 12% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 54 | 38 |
| Rentals | 41% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Springs or Napa?
A: Palm Springs has a smaller population count than Napa: 47140 compared with 79722 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Springs or in Napa?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Palm Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Springs or Napa?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Palm Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Napa does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Palm Springs versus 43% for Napa.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Springs may include: Palm-Desert, Seal-Beach, and Fair-Oaks.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z