Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Springs to Laguna Hills
This post compares Palm Springs, California to Laguna Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Springs (city) | Laguna Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,140 | 31,235 |
| Income (median) | $45,934 | $58,400 |
| Home Value (median) | $340,600 | $649,700 |
| White | 83% | 69% |
| Black | 4% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 14% |
| With Kids | 12% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 54 | 41 |
| Rentals | 41% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Springs or Laguna Hills?
A: Palm Springs has a larger population count than Laguna Hills: 47140 compared with 31235 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Springs or in Laguna Hills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Palm Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Springs or Laguna Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Palm Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palm Springs does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Palm Springs versus 29% for Laguna Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Springs may include: Palm-Desert, Seal-Beach, and Fair-Oaks.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z