Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Springs to Foothill Farms
This post compares Palm Springs, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Springs (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,140 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $45,934 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $340,600 | $201,200 |
| White | 83% | 67% |
| Black | 4% | 9% |
| Asian | 4% | 5% |
| With Kids | 12% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 54 | 33 |
| Rentals | 41% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Springs or Foothill Farms?
A: Palm Springs has a larger population count than Foothill Farms: 47140 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Springs or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Palm Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Springs or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Palm Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Palm Springs versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Springs may include: Palm-Desert, Seal-Beach, and Fair-Oaks.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z